Evolution Korea
The economic crisis which swept Asia prompted a major reappraisal the old system of government and business alliances, as well as public management of risks. In Korea, that meant an evolution of the development model.
In a controversial decision, the South Korean government has asked textbook publishers to ignore requests for removing examples of evolution from high school science textbooks. These include the evidence for the evolution of horses and of the Avian an ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A South Korean creationist group has persuaded textbook publishers to remove evidence of evolution from high school science texts. The decision was the result of a campaign run by the Society for Textbook Revise (STR) which is an affiliate of the Korea Association for Creation Research which aims to get rid of biology textbooks of "atheist materialism." The STR claims that such materialistic thinking creates a negative picture for students, and could lead to their eventual denial of faith.
Scientists around the globe expressed concern when the STR campaign was featured in the news. In a letter addressed to the editor of Nature the evolutionary biologist Jae Choe at Ewha Womans University in Seoul complained that South Korea had given in to religious prejudice. He was backed up by colleagues around the country, who set up an organization called Evolution Korea to organize a petition against the changes to the textbooks.
Some researchers are worried about the possibility that the STR campaign will be spread to other parts of the world, where the prevalence of creationism is rising. The letter to Nature warned that the anti-evolution movement could push for textbook revisions in other countries, especially those with large Christian and Muslim populations.
South Korea's cultural background is especially strong in the debate on evolution. 26 percent of South Koreans belong to of a religious group and the majority of them practice Christianity or Buddhism. Many Koreans also adhere to Ch'ondogyo - the philosophy based on Confucian principles that is a strong advocate of social harmony, individual self-cultivation and self-respect. Ch'ondogyo believes that humans are one with Hanulnim the God of the Sun, and that heaven-bound blessings can be derived through good works.
All of this has provided an ideal environment for the spread of creationism. Numerous studies have found that students who have religious backgrounds to be more hesitant to learn about evolution as compared to those who do not. The underlying reasons for this phenomenon are not clear. Students who are religious may be less experienced with the theories of science, making them more vulnerable to creationists and their influence. 에볼루션 바카라 무료체험 could be that students with a religious background may view evolution as an idea that is atheistic, making them feel uncomfortable.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent years, anti-evolution campaigns in schools have caused concern in the scientific community. A survey in 2009 revealed that 40% of Americans believed that biological evolution was a myth and that it would be in conflict with their religious beliefs. Despite the popularity of creationism in some states, a lot of scientists believe that the best strategy to counter this movement is not to actively engage in it, but to inform the public on the evidence that supports evolution.
Scientists are responsible to teach their students science that includes the theory of evolution. They also need to inform the public about the science process and how knowledge from science is collected and validated. They should explain how scientific theories are frequently challenged and revised. However, misinformation about the nature and purpose of scientific research can lead to anti-evolution beliefs.
Many people mistake the term "theory" as a hunch, or a guess. In the field of science, however, the hypothesis is tested thoroughly and empirical data is used to verify it. A theory that has survived repeated testing and observation is a scientific concept.
The debate about the evolutionary theory provides a great opportunity to discuss the importance of the scientific method and its limitations. It is essential to be aware that science is not able to answer questions about the purpose of life or meaning, but rather offers a way for living things to evolve and evolve.
A well-rounded education must include exposure to all major fields of science including evolutionary biology. This is important because many jobs and decisions require people know the way science works.
The majority of scientists around the world accept that humans have evolved over time. 에볼루션 바카라 무료체험 that predicted the adults' opinions of the consensus on this subject found that those with higher levels of education and scientific knowledge were more likely to believe there is a general consensus among scientists about human evolution. People with a higher level of religious belief but less science knowledge tend to disagree more. It is critical that educators emphasize the importance of knowing the consensus on this issue to ensure that individuals have a solid foundation for making informed choices about their health care, energy use and other policy issues.
3. Evolution and Culture
Cultural evolution is a close relative of mainstream evolutionary theory. It explores how organisms like humans learn from each other. Researchers in this field utilize elaborate models and tools that are adapted from those employed by evolutionary theorists. they look back to human prehistory to discover the origins of our capacity to learn about culture.
This approach also recognizes the differences between the characteristics of culture and biological. While biological traits are generally acquired at once (in sexual species, during fertilization) but cultural traits can be acquired over a protracted period of time. The acquisition of one cultural characteristic may affect the development and growth of a different.
In Korea, the adoption of Western elements of style in the latter part of the nineteenth and early 20th century was the result of a complex sequence of events. One of the most significant was the arrival of Japanese occupation forces, who introduced Western clothing styles and hairstyles to Korean society.
Then, when Japan departed Korea in the 1930s, a few of these trends began to revert. By the end World War II, Korea was once again united but this time under the Choson dynasty rule.
Today, Korea is a vibrant political and economic power. Despite the current global financial crisis, the country's economy has grown consistently over the past decade and is expected to maintain its steady growth in the near future.
However, the current government faces numerous challenges. One of the most significant is its inability to find a consistent policy to address the economic crisis. The crisis has exposed the shortcomings in the policies of the country particularly its dependence on foreign investment and exports that may not last.
The crisis has shaken confidence of investors. This means that the government must rethink its strategy and find ways to increase domestic demand. It will also have to overhaul the incentive, monitoring, and disciplining systems in place to guarantee the stability of the financial system. This chapter offers a variety of scenarios for how the Korean economy might grow in a post-crisis environment.
4. Evolution and Education
One of the biggest challenges for educators of evolution is how to present evolutionary concepts in ways that are appropriate for students of different ages and developmental stages. For instance, teachers need to be sensitive to the religious diversity in their classrooms and create a space where students with religious and secular beliefs feel comfortable learning evolution. Teachers should be able to recognize common misconceptions regarding evolution and be able to address them in the classroom. Additionally, teachers should have access to a variety of resources for teaching evolution and be able to find them quickly.
In this context the Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation was an important step in bringing evolutionary scientists and educators from a variety of sectors to discuss the best practices for teaching about evolution. The participants included representatives from scientific societies and educational researchers, as well as officials from government funding agencies as well as curriculum developers. The convergence of various participants helped to identify some common guidelines which will serve as the foundation for future actions.
It is essential to incorporate evolution in all science curricula at every level. To achieve this, the National Science Education Standards (NRC) call for evolution to be taught in a unified manner across all sciences, with a progression of ideas that are developmentally appropriate. A new publication from the NRC offers guidance for schools on how to integrate evolution into the science curriculum.
A number of studies have demonstrated that a more thorough and comprehensive understanding of evolution is associated with higher levels of student understanding and belief in evolution. It is difficult to estimate the causal effects of evolution in the classroom since school curricula do not change randomly and are affected by the timing of state board of education and the gubernatorial election. To overcome this problem, I use a longitudinal data set which lets me control for fixed state and year effects and individual-level variation in teacher beliefs regarding evolution.
Another important result is that teachers who are more comfortable with teaching evolution report having less intrapersonal barriers to doing so. This is in line with the notion that more confident faculty are less likely to avoid teaching about evolution in the classroom, and could be more likely to employ strategies like a reconciliatory method which is used to increase undergraduate students' acceptance of evolution.